ANTI-EUROPÄER: Anders Breivik, Abu Musab Al-Suri, and Aleksandr Dugin Walk Into a Bar…

Claus Leggewie is a German political scientist and author. His latest publication Anti-Europäer [“Anti-Europeans”] studies the increasingly fragile state of the European Union as indicated by Greece’s financial crisis and the Union’s approach to refugee issues. At a time when radicalized voices from all backgrounds question European values, Leggewie examines what unites extremists of different convictions in their rejection of the EU. His book focuses on the examples of Norwegian terrorist and mass murderer Anders Breivik, jihadist Abu Musab al-Suri, and Putin advisor Aleksandr Dugin, among others.

Claus Leggewie

Claus Leggewie

Mr. Leggewie, Europe seems to be in shambles. The Brits quit the EU. Its remaining states are split on the issues regarding refugees. How about we start this conversation with a manifesto on the beauty of the European idea?

CLAUS LEGGEWIE: That would be exactly what we need right now. As important as it is to concern ourselves with the manifestos of anti-Europeans, it is also important to disregard them and present an alternative narrative of Europe that excites the people out there and gives them perspective.

Why do we need this?

So that we rid ourselves of the currently ubiquitous notion that Europe is in danger and going under – or, as the Right is saying, that Europe is decadent. We need a narrative that mobilizes and is grounded in the reality of Europeans’ lives.

What would this successful European narrative look like?

It would be the story of how we use the next two decades to build a sustainable Europe, one that is more socially just, that preserves and creates public spaces. One that demonstrates the advantages of

European urbanity practically, and what cultural pluralism looks like. A lot of that has existed for a long time. But we have to describe more precisely what we like about Europe, color its image so that it’s more durable and attractive to future generations. This especially relies on the help of the middle generation, who live and build Europe on a daily basis through their work, everyday lives, and their social engagement, so to speak, but who hardly communicate this to the outside.

This seems very hard at the moment. Those who are for the absorption of refugees are asked to justify their position. Those who want to help people in need have to defend their stance. The discourse is dictated by the Right.

But it doesn’t have to be this way. The topic of refugees dominates media discourse and the fantasies of many Europeans, but there are other more important topics that include their integration and a wish to spell out our cultural pluralism. An attractive European agenda also answers open questions of integration, which are no less relevant to long-established inhabitants.

Putin advisor Aleksandr Dugin

Putin advisor Aleksandr Dugin

But how do you get a grip on xenophobic tendencies? Those that exist in Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland, as well as Germany and France.

If I knew the formula to that, I’d be the head of the EU commission. There is a grain of truth to this statement: People have realized that globalization wasn’t a one-way street. But trying to refute fear by making refugee issues our number one topic is not going to get us anywhere.

What do you propose?

We have to make clear that refugees are used by the European Right only as a smoke screen to articulate feelings of obsolescence, the loss of white dominance.

So one should talk more about social questions, and less about skin color and the resulting identities?

Exactly. Because long-established residents can’t find an apartment and a proper job either.

If you live in Germany and have dark skin, it’s hard not to talk about it. Racism just is present. Are you suggesting we ignore it?

No way. Refugees face special problems on the housing market, where non-white people are discriminated. At the same time, we have to study these problems in the context of social injustice, which in this case is the scarcity of the housing market. I just want to prevent people’s skin color or religious belief – the muslim faith, for example – from becoming an absolute and therefore sociologically inapplicable to other things.

Mass murderer Anders Breivik

Mass murderer Anders Breivik

Your book Anti-Europäer uses the manifesto of Anders Breivik, the right-wing extremist, anti-Islamic terrorist, and mass murderer from Norway, to show parallels to the new Right. Is that polemic? Are you trying to say, “Even this insane brain thinks like you?”

Comparing does not mean equating. If you read Breivik’s manifesto closely, only its second part is concerned with the logistics of a terrorist attack. The first part is a typical anti-Islamist text. You can hear the things he wrote in it reproduced in identitarian circles everywhere in Europe today. I am not implying that all identitarians are terrorists. But this fantasy of Umvolkung – and, deriving from that, of violent ethnic cleansing and exclusion – can be observed not only in Breivik’s writing, but across the whole right-wing intellectual spectrum. Of course, you see this also in the protests of Pegida, the marches on refugee homes.

Do you sometimes look at Europe and think, “Is the Right stupid to fantasize about purity here?” No other continent is so heterogenous.

The switch from questions of class and social politics to questions of identity – questions the social movements of the 1960s were motivated by – meaning, the switch from class analysis and class war to questions of “race-class-gender,” has become a problem now. The American philosopher Richard Rorty already warned of the identity circus of American academia, and the resulting political correctness, in the 90s.

What do you mean by that exactly?

Take immigrants, for example. At first, they were “foreign workers,” a term highlighting social aspects. Then, they were “Turks and Kurds,” which defined them by their nationality. Today, they are “Muslims,” defined by their faith. This way, versatile identities and an occasionally occurring sense of community are stylized into stiff “we”-doms. “Us” against “them.” For example: “Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the Occident,” Pegida. As if Christians were Christians only, and Muslims steadfastly bound to all who share their origin and faith.

Jihadist Abu Musab al-Suri

Jihadist Abu Musab al-Suri

Besides Breivik, you inspect Putin’s advisor Aleksandr Dugin, a self-described “Eurasian,” as well as jihadists like the Syrian Abu Musab al-Suri. What do they have in common?

The first two reference a movement of the conservative revolution of the 1920s and 30s – a time when liberalism and democratic community were also under fire and intellectual factions developed into fascism and National Socialism. All three place great political importance on geographic spaces. To them, community is not organized by constitution, constitutionality, or democratic participation, but by regionality. This is based on the idea that geographic location determines the political system. Therefore: Christian occident, Islamic caliphate, Eurasian autocracy. All three movements also share a re-sacralization of politics.

What do you mean by that?

All three reject the separation of religion and politics. Eurasians aim to strengthen orthodoxy, jihadists want a theocracy governed by Sharia law, and westerners want a Christian-dominated culture.

You write, “If these three protagonists were locked into a cell together, they’d be at each other’s throats.”

The problem is that if they didn’t kill each other, they would discover their fatal similarities in nightly conversations. Then we see the fourth battalion of anti-Europeans. Donald Trump does not utilize religious discourse, but rather authoritarian nationalism, which positions him very close to European autocrats like Le Pen, Orbán, or Putin. We Europeans need to wake up and put Europe’s enemies in their place.

Anti-Europäer is published by Suhrkamp (Berlin, 2016).Screen Shot 2017-02-13 at 09.55.06

Claus Leggewie
Anti Europeans

Published in

Issue #31 — Winter 2016/2017HELMUT LANG

Issue # 31 — Winter 2016/2017

From 1986 to 2005, Helmut Lang systematically deconstructed every assumption about clothing and the way it is worn and communicated. As he himself once said, “I kept all the traditions and shades that were good — and then re-thought it all.” The Austrian designer’s lists of “firsts” is so long it could double as conceptual art. Lang was one of the first designers to collaborate with visual artists. The first to show clothing for men and women in a single presentation. The first to pioneer backstage photography as we know it today with Juergen Teller. The first to move a fashion house across the Atlantic … and the list goes on. In a 48-page dossier, 032c Issue 31 explores THE HELMUT LANG LEGACY and how his abrupt exit from the industry in 2005 has been felt like phantom limb in the world of fashion. The comprehensive study features essays by Ingeborg Harms and Ulf Poschardt, a roundtable with Tim Blanks, Olivier Saillard, and Neville Wakefield, an interview with Lang himself, as well as rare material from the Helmut Lang archive.

Is Calabasas the new Abu Dhabi? Are the Californian suburbs the perfect place for new energy experiments in modern apparel? In an editorial shot by MERT & MARCUS and conceptualized by KANYE WEST, 032c travels to the Los Angeles exurb of Calabasas to bathe in the dust of the Wests’ under-construction home designed by Axel Vervoordt. The shoot features cameos by KIM KARDASHIAN WEST, KHLOÉ KARDASHIAN, AMINA BLUE, TRAVIS SCOTT, and others.

“At the time we started collaborating, everything in the world of art and fashion was polished. Everything was smooth, so we felt that Prada must be rough.” For the past decade, a windowless concrete hall at the PRADA headquarters has become an architectural gymnasium for REM KOOLHAAS and his firm OMA/AMO. Traveling from Rotterdam to Milan, architecture critic Jack Self examines the phenomenon of the firm’s catwalks for the Italian mega-house, exploring how Prada and OMA/AMO have teamed up to create the foundation of a new corporate aesthetic.

“You fuck. Or you don’t fuck. You can’t fuck a little.” In a 2012 reportage, writer Alexander Gorkow and photographer Andreas Mühe followed RAMMSTEIN on their tour of America. Since then, our private obsession with this document has become a matter of political urgency. What was once the anti-capitalist spectacle of an East German rock band in 2012, now reads like a seismograph for the right-wing political landscape of 2016. Here, we witness ideology’s opposite: raw energy unhinged from the burden of truth.

As our contemporary economy grows to demand CREATIVITY from all of its citizens, it has become increasingly unclear exactly what “creativity” is. In a double-feature illustrated by the Japanese photographer Kenta Cobayashi, Joachim Bessing speaks with Wolfgang Ullrich and Lars Vollmer on how society’s idea of a creative ethos has transformed within the digital revolution.

“People say this is vandalism.” 032c’s Bianca Heuser and photographer Nadine Fraczkowski take us inside ANNE IMHOF’s Angst, a grand and opaque artwork that has drifted across the world like a low-pressure system. Furnished with smoke machines, sleeping bags, razors, and bongs, the three-act immersive opera is a training camp for the denizens of hyper-capitalism.

Founded as sneaker blogs in 2005, HYPEBEAST and HIGHSNOBIETY have grown into large and disruptive forces in fashion. Simultaneously fuelling and gorging on a new generation’s appetite for content, they have set a rabid pace that has multinational brands following suit. Travelling up the feed and towards “the heart of content,” 032c’s Thom Bettridge and photographer Lukas Wassmann visit the companies’ respective HQs in Hong Kong and Berlin to suss out what this revolution spells for the landscape of media at large.

In the “SSENSE Files,” we present scenes of cross-platform madness from our work at The section features seven interviews with a range of cultural producers from rappers LIL YACHTY and SCHOOLBOY Q to jewelry designer GAIA REPOSSI, stylist ANDREW RICHARDSON, author NATASHA STAGG, artist SIMON DENNY, and artist/musician FATIMA AL QADIRI.

In our fashion section, WILLY VANDERPERRE and OLIVIER RIZZO shoot Clara 3000 in the editorial “Don’t Dream It’s Over.” GOSHA RUBCHINSKIY and 032c fashion director Mel Ottenberg team up for the ultimate study on Seinfeld-chic, while PIERRE DEBUSSCHERE and 032c fashion editor Marc Goehring vaporize Flemish baroque into a warped digital reality.

This issue, we also proudly introduce our “BERLIN REVIEW,” a section dedicated to our favorite printed matter of the season.

All this and more on 296 pages!