Galina Balashova: The Artistic Director Behind Four Generations of Soviet Spacecraft

Can intimacy exist in a vacuum?

When architect Galina Balashova was commissioned to devise the interiors of Soviet space capsules, she was given a futurist-design dream. Without the limitations of gravity – with no up or down – architecture could be freed from earth-bound requirements such as a ceiling or floor. Yet Balashova had the visionary insight to realize that the mind has its own internal gravity, a craving for familiarity.

After decades of remaining classified under the Soviet government, the work of the space architect Galina Balashova has now been assembled by the German Architecture Museum (DAM) in Frankfurt- am-Main. Balashova had a hand in designing four generations of spacecraft: the plans for the Soyuz capsules, space stations Mir and Salyut, as well as the orbital glider Buran. The sole architect working amongst banks of aesthetically agnostic engineers, Balashova took on the utopian design challenge of making the void habitable. The marriage of experimental and meticulous thinking that Balashova brought to quotidian fixtures resonates with contemporary industrial designers such as Marc Newson. She conceived each minute de- tail: from logical button configurations on control decks, to chairs that accommodate weightlessness, to even the stitched insignias on cosmonaut outfits.

DAM_Balaschowa_Presse03_ArchivGalinaBalaschowa
Proposal for the cabin of the spacecraft Mir (1980)
image description
Proposal for the landing module of Soyuz T (1970)
DAM_Balaschowa345-2_2_ArchivGalinaBalaschowa
Proposal for the exterior of the spacecraft Mir (1980)
29_dragged-001
Galina Balashova in 2012

Hired by Sergei Korolev’s Experimental Design Bureau OKB-1 in 1957, Balashova operated behind the testosterone-charged posturing of Cold War propaganda. For over thirty years, hers was an anonymous form of political art that subverted the practices of her Russian constructivist forebears. Kazmir Malevich’s claims to autonomous zones of free-floating form seem pathetically abstract in comparison to Balashova’s designs. Within her architectural reality, objects and beings were truly free- floating, and she had the agency to tangibly shape the granular experience of space.

Balashova understood that to ensure the wellbeing of cosmonauts, capsule chambers had to mimic an environment where gravity exists. Her prototype de- signs of bookcases and foldaway tables evoke scenes from a typical modernist home of the time. Yet something more mysterious is at play. The design archetype of the terrestrial toilet bowl is informed by the earth’s ability to make things fall. However, under zero-gravity, such a design loses its functionality. Since Balashova’s constraints were dictated by laws of psychology rather than physics, these objects become hollowed-out surrogates for the domestic. Their cladding, fittings, and surfaces are uncanny shells floating within a distant yet strangely familiar environment.

It appears Balashova has straddled two perceptual realms since birth. Her first childhood memory was falling down a rabbit hole in the woods near her home in Lobna, a moment that she seems to revisit through her ouevre of watercolor landscapes. A prolific and skilled painter, she placed scenes of snowy Muscovite park- lands into light metal frames and attached them to the windows of Soyuz orbitals as a way of reminding the cosmonauts of life on earth. While the cosmonauts would return to earth in the landing module, these watercolors would either remain in orbit or be burnt up if they edged too close to the atmosphere – ephemeral odes impossibly longing for home. Floating amongst charred debris, they stand as artefacts of the iconoclastic soul within the Soviet cosmonautic machine, or perhaps just as silent missives to the gods from a suburban Sunday painter.

This article is taken from 032c Issue #29: “Nest.”

Architecture 36Russia 10
Space
The Soviet Union

Published in

Issue #29 — Winter 2015/2016Nest

Federally approved in the United States in 1987, Prozac calmed the raw nerves of the 1980s and gave the 1990s a convivial peacefulness, an easy assuredness against panic. Something new, uncertain, and very magical was also afoot for publishing. The digital revolution that erupted in the middle of the decade gave everyone with an Internet connection the ability to broadcast and publish. Without exaggeration, the interiors quarterly NEST (founded in 1997) represents a final claim to the autonomous potential of the American print periodical. “Before Prozac, I was afraid and I did nothing. I watched soap operas all day,” says JOSEPH HOLTZMAN, the agoraphobic decorator and amateur genius who published Nest from the confines his Upper East Side apartment. Along with a rotating masthead that included aristocrats, musicians, novelists, and pornstars, Holtzman created a magazine that freely mixed fantasy and luxury with neuroses and death, all scrambling toward the question of how we define (and are defined by) the rooms we live in. 032c celebrates Joseph Holzman’s Nest, or how Prozac spawned the greatest interiors magazine ever.

As encoded in its unironically straightforward name, VETEMENTS was founded in a Paris living room with a simple mission: to bring the focus back to clothes. Suleman Anaya speaks with Vetements’s DEMNA GVASALIA on the eve of his appointment as artistic director of BALENCIAGA.

“Old people can keep making wars for money, but we’ll grow up and change the world” — For this cover story, designer and photographer GOSHA RUBCHINSKIY takes us inside his vertically integrated youth universe with an interview and a fashion excursion to a metal concert with LOTTA VOKOVA.

What is RADICAL? — As the booms and busts of our convergence culture accelerate to the point of incomprehension, we sometimes stop to wonder: Is radical here to save us or destroy us? In search of the radical, we contacted a group of friends, collaborators, and people we admire to ask them a simple question: “What is the most radical thing you’ve encountered in the last six months?”

Bitcoins, anyone? Hannes Grasseger travels to RICHARD BRANSON’s Blockchain Summit on Necker Island—where Silicon Valley collides with Springbreakers—and discovers how the global economy is being overturned by men in flip flops.
Love. Fear. And the Network.—The ever-prolific ZYGMUNT BAUMAN is neither pessimistic nor optimistic about the state of the contemporary world’s affairs, “There is a third category in which I count myself: the one of hope.” Peter Haffner speaks with the 89-year-old sociologist, who holds a mirror up to our generation.

“We are preparing to exist in a purely virtual world.” — Post-Human by way of Coca-Cola Light and café americanos, curator SUSANNE PFEFFER can often be found on the Deutsche Bahn ICE, the high-speed railway system she uses to download herself for openings and studio visits across Germany. Since taking over Kassel’s Fridericianum in 2013, she has turned Europe’s oldest museum (founded in 1779) into the epicenter for art’s post-human turn.

Part anarchist geography, part slacker social science, Guy Debord’s “Théorie de la Dérive” advocates the practice of aimless wandering through the city streets. For “Bench Theory,” THOMAS JEPPE and MANUEL BÜRGER have created a find-all-replace rendition of Debord’s text, as a way of generating social micro-climates where human interaction can occur without the assistance of 3G geolocation.
“Window-shopping is free!” — Jina Khayyer speaks with FAYE McLEOD, Louis Vuitton’s visual creative director and the mastermind behind the world’s most imaginative window displays.

PIERRE DESBUSSCHERE and MEL OTTENBERG bring us a photoshopped desire and ultra-modernism of biblical proportions in their fashion story ISAIAH 13:13.

SEAN + SENG and MIKE GUINNESS give us a seductive tour of THE ISLE OF SKYE, aided by a health dose of moon-gazing and dirty day dreams.

Kanye’s neo-nihilism, pillow-talk between architects, rabid dobermans, and more in SELECT, a review of our favorite products of the season.